Skip to content
Idea AtlasSign in

SafeLog

As described:StopNarrowed:Narrow

No as described. Go small, as COR/SECOR audit evidence for Alberta employers, sold through consultants.

construction & employers · ~US$125 per account per month · last reviewed (next review by 29 Dec 2026) · 19 cited sources

Save
Share

← All research

3. Feature-by-Feature Scrutiny (the Catalog Idea's Features)

Categories:

  • Table stakes (TS): customers expect it. It earns nothing, but its absence costs you.
  • Differentiator (D): a real reason to choose you over the alternatives.
  • Distraction (X): built but unlikely to move revenue or retention.
  • Liability (L): creates support, compliance, legal or trust risk.

Some features sit in two buckets. The primary bucket comes first.

3.1 Classification table

#Feature (from catalog idea E2)CategoryReasoning
1Hazard assessments (field-level and site-level)TS / LEvery competitor has them, and Mitti gives them away free. Capture is table stakes. Writing the content is a liability: if your template or an AI suggestion misses a hazard and someone is hurt, you share the blame. Templates come from the consultant or employer.
2Toolbox talks (topic, attendance sign-in, signatures)TSExpected. It becomes useful only when each talk is counted toward the audit element that asks for regular safety meetings.
3Incident reportsTSExpected everywhere. Keep them simple, with investigation fields the audit asks for (root cause, corrective action, closed date).
4Worker certifications (tickets, expiry dates)TS → DA certificate list is table stakes. Expiry alerts tied to the audit question about training records are a weekly reason to open the app. SiteDocs markets certification tracking too, so the edge is small.
5Audit evidenceD (the product)Filing every record against the audit element it proves, showing gaps by element and month, and exporting an indexed pack for the auditor. This is the only feature a customer will pay a premium for. It's buried last in the catalog's list. Pull it to the front.
6"Digital forms" as the positioningLIt puts you against free tiers and a US$770M exit. Nobody searches for "a new forms app". They search for "SECOR audit checklist" and "COR audit deadline".
7OSHA 300/300A/301 logsX (for this wedge)A different country, a different rule and an annual job, already sold by 6+ small tools (02). Don't build it unless the product enters the US, and then only after its own assessment.
8Electronic ITA submission (CSV or API)XSame reason. OSHA already provides a free web form and CSV upload. Worth doing only as part of a US product, never on its own.
9COR audit packs for "one province"DCorrect instinct. Keep it to one province and one certifying partner's audit tool until renewal is proven.
10Serving "contractors and small employers" broadlyLToo wide. Construction contractors holding or chasing a certificate in Alberta are the buyer. Other small employers don't have an audit deadline.

3.2 Scoreboard

CategoryCountFeatures
Table stakes4Hazard assessment capture, toolbox talks, incident reports, certificate list
Differentiator2Audit evidence mapping and packs, one province's audit tool (plus certificate alerts, a weak D)
Distraction2OSHA 300 logs, ITA submission
Liability3Authoring hazard content, "digital forms" positioning, "all small employers" as the buyer

About 20% of what was described is a reason to buy. The rest is what customers expect, or someone else's market.

3.3 "Building to avoid selling": explicit call-outs

  1. A drag-and-drop form builder. It's fun to build and it demos well. It's also what SiteDocs, Mitti and Safesite already do better. Ship fixed templates the consultant can edit, nothing more.
  2. Native iOS and Android apps. A PWA with offline capture handles a truck with no signal. Two app stores are a way to stay busy instead of calling consultants.
  3. Dashboards and "safety analytics". Leading indicators and charts look good in a pitch. A 12-worker contractor wants one thing: "what's missing before the audit?"
  4. A second province or the US. Each is a separate rulebook. Don't start one before Alberta renews.

3.4 What a disciplined v1 looks like

Keep: offline mobile capture (hazard assessment, inspection, toolbox talk, incident, certificate upload) + element-by-element evidence index + monthly gap report + indexed evidence pack export + consultant multi-client view. One province, one audit tool, on web (PWA). Defer: corrective-action tracking with reminders, subcontractor pre-qualification, a second province. Cut: the form builder, native apps, OSHA 300 and ITA, analytics dashboards, AI-written hazard content.